[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSnUni8Vk5BCweNgfOSFPEsFXiAegsz3FgBSd0PNL3OoTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:35:45 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: cleanup assertion macro internal variables
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 5:52 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> All the operands should be tagged `const`.
> We're only assigning them to variables so that we can compare them (e.g.
> check if left == right, etc.) and avoid evaluating expressions multiple
> times.
>
> There's no need for them to be mutable.
>
> Also rename the helper variable `loc` to `__loc` like we do with
> `__assertion` and `__strs` to avoid potential name collisions with user
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> ---
> Note: this patch is based on top of
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220125210011.3817742-4-dlatypov@google.com/
> There is no semantic dependency between the patches, but they touch
> adjacent lines.
> ---
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> include/kunit/test.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 088ff394ae94..00b9ff7783ab 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -779,10 +779,10 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
>
> #define KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, assert_type, pass, assert_class, INITIALIZER, fmt, ...) do { \
> if (unlikely(!(pass))) { \
> - static const struct kunit_loc loc = KUNIT_CURRENT_LOC; \
> + static const struct kunit_loc __loc = KUNIT_CURRENT_LOC; \
> struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \
> kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, \
> - &loc, \
> + &__loc, \
> assert_type, \
> &__assertion.assert, \
> fmt, \
> @@ -872,8 +872,8 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
> fmt, \
> ...) \
> do { \
> - typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> - typeof(right) __right = (right); \
> + const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> + const typeof(right) __right = (right); \
> static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { \
> .operation = #op, \
> .left_text = #left, \
> @@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ do { \
> fmt, \
> ...) \
> do { \
> - typeof(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \
> + const typeof(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \
> \
> KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \
> assert_type, \
> --
> 2.35.0.rc2.247.g8bbb082509-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists