linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH] i915/gvt: intel_gvt_match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220128050111.GA69282@e2c1dfe2c692>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:01:11 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>, hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com,
        jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@...el.com>,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] i915/gvt: intel_gvt_match_device() can be static

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c:45:6: warning: symbol 'intel_gvt_match_device' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
 handlers.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
index dad31ad074a03..459f0d902f64f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 #include "display/intel_display_types.h"
 #include "display/intel_fbc.h"
 
-bool intel_gvt_match_device(struct intel_gvt *gvt,
+static bool intel_gvt_match_device(struct intel_gvt *gvt,
 		unsigned long device)
 {
 	return intel_gvt_get_device_type(gvt->gt->i915) & device;