lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfOeL6B4CowkCQBC@piliu.users.ipa.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:41:35 +0800
From:   Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kexec: disable cpu hotplug until the rebooting cpu is
 stable

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 05:41:44PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
Hi Baoquan,

Thanks for reviewing, please see comment inlined
> Hi Pingfan,
> 
> On 01/27/22 at 05:02pm, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > The following identical code piece appears in both
> > migrate_to_reboot_cpu() and smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus():
> > 
> > 	if (!cpu_online(primary_cpu))
> > 		primary_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> > 
> > This is due to a breakage like the following:
> >    migrate_to_reboot_cpu();
> >    cpu_hotplug_enable();
> >                           --> comes a cpu_down(this_cpu) on other cpu
> >    machine_shutdown();
> > 
> > Although the kexec-reboot task can get through a cpu_down() on its cpu,
> > this code looks a little confusing.
> > 
> > Make things straight forward by keeping cpu hotplug disabled until
> > smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus() holds cpu_add_remove_lock. By this way, the
> > breakage is squashed out and the rebooting cpu can keep unchanged.
> 
> If I didn't go through code wrongly, you may miss the x86 case.
> Several ARCHes do call smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus() in machine_shutdown()
> in kexec reboot code path, while x86 doesn't. If I am right, you may
> need reconsider if this patch is needed or need be adjustd.
> 
Citing the code piece in kernel_kexec()

                migrate_to_reboot_cpu();

                /*
                 * migrate_to_reboot_cpu() disables CPU hotplug assuming that
                 * no further code needs to use CPU hotplug (which is true in
                 * the reboot case). However, the kexec path depends on using
                 * CPU hotplug again; so re-enable it here.
                 */
                cpu_hotplug_enable();
                pr_notice("Starting new kernel\n");
                machine_shutdown();

So maybe it can be considered in such way: "cpu_hotplug_enable()" is not
needed by x86 and ppc, so this patch removes it, while re-displace it in
a more appropriate place for arm64/riscv ...

> Are you optimizing code path, or you meet a real problem? I haven't
> checked v1, but I also didn't see it's told in patch log which case it
> is.
> 
Simplify the code path and make the logic look straight forward.

And sorry for bad expression. I had thought I expressed it by (citing
git log)

|| The following identical code piece appears in both
                 ^^^^^^^^
|| migrate_to_reboot_cpu() and smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus():
|| 
|| 	if (!cpu_online(primary_cpu))
|| 		primary_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
|| 
|| This is due to a breakage like the following:
                    ^^^^^^^^
||    migrate_to_reboot_cpu();
||    cpu_hotplug_enable();
||                           --> comes a cpu_down(this_cpu) on other cpu
||    machine_shutdown();
|| 
|| Although the kexec-reboot task can get through a cpu_down() on its cpu,
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^
|| this code looks a little confusing.

Should I rephrase it?

Thanks,

	Pingfan

> > 
> > Note: this patch only affects the kexec-reboot on arches, which rely on
> > cpu hotplug mechanism.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
> > Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> > Cc: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> > Cc: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> > Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> > Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> >  improve commit log
> > 
> >  kernel/cpu.c        | 16 ++++++++++------
> >  kernel/kexec_core.c | 10 ++++------
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> > index 9c92147f0812..87bdf21de950 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> > @@ -1240,20 +1240,24 @@ int remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_cpu);
> >  
> > +/* primary_cpu keeps unchanged after migrate_to_reboot_cpu() */
> >  void smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus(unsigned int primary_cpu)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int cpu;
> >  	int error;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Block other cpu hotplug event, so primary_cpu is always online if
> > +	 * it is not touched by us
> > +	 */
> >  	cpu_maps_update_begin();
> > -
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Make certain the cpu I'm about to reboot on is online.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * This is inline to what migrate_to_reboot_cpu() already do.
> > +	 * migrate_to_reboot_cpu() disables CPU hotplug assuming that
> > +	 * no further code needs to use CPU hotplug (which is true in
> > +	 * the reboot case). However, the kexec path depends on using
> > +	 * CPU hotplug again; so re-enable it here.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (!cpu_online(primary_cpu))
> > -		primary_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> > +	__cpu_hotplug_enable();
> >  
> >  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		if (cpu == primary_cpu)
> > diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > index 68480f731192..db4fa6b174e3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > @@ -1168,14 +1168,12 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> >  		kexec_in_progress = true;
> >  		kernel_restart_prepare("kexec reboot");
> >  		migrate_to_reboot_cpu();
> > -
> >  		/*
> > -		 * migrate_to_reboot_cpu() disables CPU hotplug assuming that
> > -		 * no further code needs to use CPU hotplug (which is true in
> > -		 * the reboot case). However, the kexec path depends on using
> > -		 * CPU hotplug again; so re-enable it here.
> > +		 * migrate_to_reboot_cpu() disables CPU hotplug. If an arch
> > +		 * relies on the cpu teardown to achieve reboot, it needs to
> > +		 * re-enable CPU hotplug there.
> >  		 */
> > -		cpu_hotplug_enable();
> > +
> >  		pr_notice("Starting new kernel\n");
> >  		machine_shutdown();
> >  	}
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ