linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] can: isotp: isotp_rcv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:07:04 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:     "Ziyang Xuan (William)" <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: isotp: isotp_rcv_cf(): fix so->rx race problem

On 28.01.2022 08:56:19, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> I've seen the frame processing sometimes freezes for one second when
> stressing the isotp_rcv() from multiple sources. This finally freezes
> the entire softirq which is either not good and not needed as we only
> need to fix this race for stress tests - and not for real world usage
> that does not create this case.

Hmmm, this doesn't sound good. Can you test with LOCKDEP enabled?

> 
> Therefore I created a V2 patch which uses the spin_trylock() to simply drop
> the incomming frame in the race condition.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20220128074327.52229-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/T/
> 
> Please take a look, if it also fixes the issue in your test setup.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)