[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220128112619.GA7@adf6a34bf206>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:26:19 +0000
From: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@...tbaum.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 0/9] 5.16.4-rc1 review
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.4 release.
> There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Hi Greg,
5.16.4-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6)
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)
In addition: build tested on:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@...tbaum.com>
--
Rudi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists