linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: nVMX: Fix Windows 11 + WSL2 + Enlightened VMCS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pmobg9h1.fsf@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:34:34 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: nVMX: Fix Windows 11 + WSL2 + Enlightened VMCS

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:

> On 1/28/22 15:11, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> I see your pull request to Linus, will send the backport when it lands.
>> In fact, all 5 patches apply to 5.16 without issues but I guess stable@
>> tooling won't pick them up automatically.
>
> I noticed, but I wasn't sure what the dependencies were among them and 
> whether you'd prefer to only have patches 3-5; so I didn't just add "Cc: 
> stable" myself.

Actually yes, patches 1/2 don't fix any "real" issue (afair) so we can
be a bit more conservative with 5.16.

-- 
Vitaly