linux-kernel - [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:18:03 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 01/10] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>

First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build
time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is
complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to be having issues.

It may be necessary to also update the relocation table for the values
in the mcount table. Not only do we have to sort the table, but also
update the relocations that may be applied to the items in the table.

If the system is not relocatable, then it is fine to sort, but if it is,
some architectures may have issues (although x86 does not as it shifts all
addresses the same).

Add a HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT that an architecture can set to say it is
safe to do the sorting at build time.

Also update the config to compile in build time sorting in the sorttable
code in scripts/ to depend on CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/944D10DA-8200-4BA9-8D0A-3BED9AA99F82@linux.ibm.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220127153821.3bc1ac6e@gandalf.local.home

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [arm64]
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 72b3942a173c ("scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig     | 1 +
 arch/x86/Kconfig     | 1 +
 kernel/trace/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
 scripts/Makefile     | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index fabe39169b12..4c97cb40eebb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config ARM
 	select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32
 	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
 	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
+	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK if !XIP_KERNEL
 	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU
 	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index ebe8fc76949a..9f5bd41bf660 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config X86
 	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK	if HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
 	select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
 	select HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT		if STACK_VALIDATION
+	select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
 	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
 	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
index 752ed89a293b..a5eb5e7fd624 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
@@ -70,10 +70,16 @@ config HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
 	help
 	  C version of recordmcount available?
 
+config HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
+       bool
+       help
+         An architecture selects this if it sorts the mcount_loc section
+	 at build time.
+
 config BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
        bool
        default y
-       depends on BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT && !S390
+       depends on HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT && DYNAMIC_FTRACE
        help
          Sort the mcount_loc section at build time.
 
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile
index ecd3acacd0ec..ce5aa9030b74 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile
+++ b/scripts/Makefile
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/x86/include
 HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DUNWINDER_ORC_ENABLED
 endif
 
-ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
+ifdef CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
 HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DMCOUNT_SORT_ENABLED
 endif
 
-- 
2.33.0