linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220129062959.GU4686@dragon>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:30:00 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...i.sm>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-imx@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi_csi port numbering

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:33:24AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> hi Shawn and all interested,
> 
> This is a fix for an embarrassing bug that slipped into commit
> bcadd5f66c2a ("arm64: dts: imx8mq: add mipi csi phy and csi bridge descriptions")
> and commit fed7603597fa ("arm64: dts: imx8mq-librem5: describe the selfie cam").
> 
> When preparing the imx8mq.dtsi description I only tested with port@1
> being connected to the csi bridge, but what I sent said port@0.
> 
> I have this on my list for a while and want to sort this out now. I'm
> sorry for the inconvenience. Until now imx8mq-librem5 is the only user
> (maybe because of this :).
> 
> thank you,
> 
>                               martin
> 
> 
> Martin Kepplinger (2):
>   arm64: dts: imx8mq: fix mipi_csi bidirectional port numbers
>   arm64: dts: imx8mq-librem5: fix mipi_csi1 port number to sensor

Applied both, thanks!