lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YfT7m3muMAFzCooc@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:32:27 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
        Zhou Qingyang <zhou1615@....edu>,
        Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/acr: Fix undefined behavior in
 nvkm_acr_hsfw_load_bl()

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:57:36PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-28 at 14:53 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 2:20 PM Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sigh-thank you for catching this - I had totally forgot about the umn.edu
> > > ban.
> > > I pushed this already but I will go ahead and send a revert for this
> > > patch.
> > > Will cc you on it as well.
> > 
> > This seems short-sighted.  If the patch is valid I see no reason to
> > not accept it.  I'm not trying to downplay the mess umn got into, but
> > as long as the patch is well scrutinized and fixes a valid issue, it
> > should be applied rather than leaving potential bugs in place.
> > 
> 
> Yeah - I sent a revert for this, but that was mainly just to make sure I
> didn't cause problems with Linus or something like that. If it's all the same
> I'd much rather just leave this patch in, as looking at the code the fix seems
> completely valid.

You will not cause any problem at all, don't worry about this, it's not
your fault or responsibility.  If you think the patch is fine, that's
great, no problems.  But be extra careful here, treat these developers
as you would with any other "they are known to send bad patches so are
safe to ignore if I don't want to deal with it" group that many of us
maintainers already have to defend against.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ