linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvk5Ye+6Y+Tu0mwYhe9bEL5y+dgAmQKDpQ=2CFtu9Td9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jan 2022 15:08:26 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 0/1] 4.4.301-rc1 review

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.301 release.
> There are 1 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.301-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 4.4.301-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.4.y
* git commit: 187d7c3b8ca09131c71f6dbb8c8761f7f809402c
* git describe: v4.4.300-2-g187d7c3b8ca0
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.4.y/build/v4.4.300-2-g187d7c3b8ca0

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.4.299-114-g67ca9c44f63d)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 33090, pass: 26341, fail: 104, skip: 5946, xfail: 699

## Build Summary
* arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 30 total, 24 passed, 6 failed

## Test suites summary
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org