[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHSGGUhmAdOFzpHJrMjfts-AgdpVJ6LJRkmm9_xLL0guw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:19:42 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] memblock: define functions to set the usable memory range
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 22:05, Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, it seems that this issue was already addressed in:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211215021348.8766-1-kernelfans@gmail.com/
>
> ..which has now been pulled in, and sent to stable@ for 5.15. I
> somehow missed that message, and sent my change in a few weeks
> later.
>
> The fix to just reserve the ranges does seem a bit cleaner overall,
> but this will do fine.
>
Works for me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists