[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3534d781-7d01-b42a-8974-0b1c367946f0@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 17:52:12 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on write at 0x00000000
(rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb)
Dear Zhouyi,
Thank you for taking the time.
Am 29.01.22 um 03:23 schrieb Zhouyi Zhou:
> I don't have an IBM machine, but I tried to analyze the problem using
> my x86_64 kvm virtual machine, I can't reproduce the bug using my
> x86_64 kvm virtual machine.
No idea, if it’s architecture specific.
> I saw the panic is caused by registration of sit device (A sit device
> is a type of virtual network device that takes our IPv6 traffic,
> encapsulates/decapsulates it in IPv4 packets, and sends/receives it
> over the IPv4 Internet to another host)
>
> sit device is registered in function sit_init_net:
> 1895 static int __net_init sit_init_net(struct net *net)
> 1896 {
> 1897 struct sit_net *sitn = net_generic(net, sit_net_id);
> 1898 struct ip_tunnel *t;
> 1899 int err;
> 1900
> 1901 sitn->tunnels[0] = sitn->tunnels_wc;
> 1902 sitn->tunnels[1] = sitn->tunnels_l;
> 1903 sitn->tunnels[2] = sitn->tunnels_r;
> 1904 sitn->tunnels[3] = sitn->tunnels_r_l;
> 1905
> 1906 if (!net_has_fallback_tunnels(net))
> 1907 return 0;
> 1908
> 1909 sitn->fb_tunnel_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct ip_tunnel), "sit0",
> 1910 NET_NAME_UNKNOWN,
> 1911 ipip6_tunnel_setup);
> 1912 if (!sitn->fb_tunnel_dev) {
> 1913 err = -ENOMEM;
> 1914 goto err_alloc_dev;
> 1915 }
> 1916 dev_net_set(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev, net);
> 1917 sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->rtnl_link_ops = &sit_link_ops;
> 1918 /* FB netdevice is special: we have one, and only one per netns.
> 1919 * Allowing to move it to another netns is clearly unsafe.
> 1920 */
> 1921 sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->features |= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL;
> 1922
> 1923 err = register_netdev(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev);
> register_netdev on line 1923 will call if_nlmsg_size indirectly.
>
> On the other hand, the function that calls the paniced strlen is if_nlmsg_size:
> (gdb) disassemble if_nlmsg_size
> Dump of assembler code for function if_nlmsg_size:
> 0xffffffff81a0dc20 <+0>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> 0xffffffff81a0dc25 <+5>: push %rbp
> 0xffffffff81a0dc26 <+6>: push %r15
> 0xffffffff81a0dd04 <+228>: je 0xffffffff81a0de20 <if_nlmsg_size+512>
> 0xffffffff81a0dd0a <+234>: mov 0x10(%rbp),%rdi
> ...
> => 0xffffffff81a0dd0e <+238>: callq 0xffffffff817532d0 <strlen>
> 0xffffffff81a0dd13 <+243>: add $0x10,%eax
> 0xffffffff81a0dd16 <+246>: movslq %eax,%r12
Excuse my ignorance, would that look the same for ppc64le?
Unfortunately, I didn’t save the problematic `vmlinuz` file, but on a
current build (without rcutorture) I have the line below, where strlen
shows up.
(gdb) disassemble if_nlmsg_size
[…]
0xc000000000f7f82c <+332>: bl 0xc000000000a10e30 <strlen>
[…]
> and the C code for 0xffffffff81a0dd0e is following (line 524):
> 515 static size_t rtnl_link_get_size(const struct net_device *dev)
> 516 {
> 517 const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops = dev->rtnl_link_ops;
> 518 size_t size;
> 519
> 520 if (!ops)
> 521 return 0;
> 522
> 523 size = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) + /* IFLA_LINKINFO */
> 524 nla_total_size(strlen(ops->kind) + 1); /* IFLA_INFO_KIND */
How do I connect the disassemby output with the corresponding line?
> But ops is assigned the value of sit_link_ops in function sit_init_net
> line 1917, so I guess something must happened between the calls.
>
> Do we have KASAN in IBM machine? would KASAN help us find out what
> happened in between?
Unfortunately, KASAN is not support on Power, I have, as far as I can
see. From `arch/powerpc/Kconfig`:
select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN if PPC32 &&
PPC_PAGE_SHIFT <= 14
select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC if PPC32 &&
PPC_PAGE_SHIFT <= 14
> Hope I can be of more helpful.
Some distributions support multi-arch, so they easily allow
crosscompiling for different architectures.
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists