linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 06/17] riscv: compat: Add basic compat date type implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3_kVB78-26sxdsEjb3MMcco6U55tc7siCBFZbJjyH6Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:56:25 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, Wei Fu <wefu@...hat.com>,
        Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
        Wang Junqiang <wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 06/17] riscv: compat: Add basic compat date type implementation

On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 1:17 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> +
> +#define COMPAT_RLIM_INFINITY   0x7fffffff
>
> +#define F_GETLK64      12
> +#define F_SETLK64      13
> +#define F_SETLKW64     14

These now come from the generic definitions I think. The flock definitions
are just the normal ones, and AFAICT the RLIM_INIFINITY definition here
is actually wrong and should be the default 0xffffffffu to match the
native (~0UL) definition.

            Arnd