[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSncO56y02RkUMeBU2rpqxXgDudL24gG0UUqzhX58JqjJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 12:15:01 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: fix missing f in f-string in run_checks.py
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:17 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> We're missing the `f` prefix to have python do string interpolation, so
> we'd never end up printing what the actual "unexpected" error is.
>
> Fixes: ee92ed38364e ("kunit: add run_checks.py script to validate kunit changes")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> ---
Looks good!
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cheers,
-- David
> tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py b/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
> index 4f32133ed77c..13d854afca9d 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/run_checks.py
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ def main(argv: Sequence[str]) -> None:
> elif isinstance(ex, subprocess.CalledProcessError):
> print(f'{name}: FAILED')
> else:
> - print('{name}: unexpected exception: {ex}')
> + print(f'{name}: unexpected exception: {ex}')
> continue
>
> output = ex.output
>
> base-commit: 6125a5c70acddd9fc1fb7329047a254c74d0173c
> --
> 2.35.0.rc2.247.g8bbb082509-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists