[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf93c715-97c6-7fff-e24e-e9b418b9fb60@mediatek.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:43:07 +0800
From: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
To: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<hui.liu@...iatek.com>, <sen.chu@...iatek.com>
CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Yuchen Huang <yuchen.huang@...iatek.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
Wen Su <wen.su@...iatek.com>, Wens Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
Rex-BC Chen <Rex-BC.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Macpaul Lin <macpaul@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v8 8/8] arm64: dts: mt6359: add PMIC MT6359 related
nodes
On 1/26/22 3:28 PM, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> On 1/25/22 4:32 PM, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>
>> On 6/16/21 10:07 PM, Hsin-hsiung Wang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2021-06-11 at 16:09 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 26/05/2021 08:52, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
>>>>> From: Wen Su <wen.su@...iatek.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> add PMIC MT6359 related nodes which is for MT6779 platform
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Su <wen.su@...iatek.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> changes since v7:
>>>>> - no change.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6359.dtsi | 298
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-evb.dts | 1 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 299 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6359.dtsi
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6359.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6359.dtsi
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..18c0d53
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt6359.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>
>>>> Any specific reason for not setting it "SPDX-License-Identifier:
>>>> (GPL-2.0+ OR
>>>> MIT)" ?
>>>>
>>>> Other then that, looks good.
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review, there is no special reason for the writing.
>>> I will update it in the next patch.
>>>
>> [The content of the patch has been deleted...]
>>
>> According to the reviewing note of PMIC wrap, URL:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/1615563286-22126-1-git-send-email-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com
>>
>>
>> Dear Hui and Sen,
>> could you help update and upstream the mt6359.dtsi and mt8192-evb.dts
>> with the necessary fixes?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Macpaul Lin
>
> Dear Hui,
>
> I've found patch v8 will cause build fail because pwrap node hasn't been
> merged according to [1] and [2] (mt8192). However, the pwrap node for
> mt8195 is already in [3] mt8195.dtsi. The mt8195 boards using mt6359
> will need mt6359.dtsi for enabling more peripherals.
>
> I think to split the mt8192 part into the other patch in next version
> could reduce the dependencies between mt6359.dtsi and mt8192.dtsi at
> this stage. Hence we don't need to wait pwrap node be merged in
> mt8192.dtsi.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1615563286-22126-6-git-send-email-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com/
>
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/e33053cf-f337-d7f6-fbf6-93d385f7e683@gmail.com/
> [3]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220112114724.1953-4-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com/
>
>
> After that, you can have my Reviewed-by tag in next version.
>
> Reviewed-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
>
> Thanks :)
> Macpaul Lin
Just a remind:
The updated version of this patch [4] "arm64: dts: mt6359: add PMIC
MT6359 related nodes" has been update and resend as a new patchset [5].
The new patchset [5] passed built test with the v9 and v10's dependent
patch [6].
Where the previous updated note of build test result is here [7].
[4]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1622011927-359-9-git-send-email-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com/
[5] https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg472119.html
[6]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220130023209.16275-1-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com/
[7] https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg472149.html
Thanks
Macpaul Lin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists