lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220130174421.GS4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date:   Sun, 30 Jan 2022 09:44:21 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Cc:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on write at 0x00000000
 (rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb)

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:24:44PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Dear Paul
> 
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 4:19 PM Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Zhouyi,
> >
> >
> > Am 30.01.22 um 01:21 schrieb Zhouyi Zhou:
> >
> > > Thank you for your instructions, I learned a lot from this process.
> >
> > Same on my end.
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:52 AM Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> wrote:
> >
> > >> Am 29.01.22 um 03:23 schrieb Zhouyi Zhou:
> > >>
> > >>> I don't have an IBM machine, but I tried to analyze the problem using
> > >>> my x86_64 kvm virtual machine, I can't reproduce the bug using my
> > >>> x86_64 kvm virtual machine.
> > >>
> > >> No idea, if it’s architecture specific.
> > >>
> > >>> I saw the panic is caused by registration of sit device (A sit device
> > >>> is a type of virtual network device that takes our IPv6 traffic,
> > >>> encapsulates/decapsulates it in IPv4 packets, and sends/receives it
> > >>> over the IPv4 Internet to another host)
> > >>>
> > >>> sit device is registered in function sit_init_net:
> > >>> 1895    static int __net_init sit_init_net(struct net *net)
> > >>> 1896    {
> > >>> 1897        struct sit_net *sitn = net_generic(net, sit_net_id);
> > >>> 1898        struct ip_tunnel *t;
> > >>> 1899        int err;
> > >>> 1900
> > >>> 1901        sitn->tunnels[0] = sitn->tunnels_wc;
> > >>> 1902        sitn->tunnels[1] = sitn->tunnels_l;
> > >>> 1903        sitn->tunnels[2] = sitn->tunnels_r;
> > >>> 1904        sitn->tunnels[3] = sitn->tunnels_r_l;
> > >>> 1905
> > >>> 1906        if (!net_has_fallback_tunnels(net))
> > >>> 1907            return 0;
> > >>> 1908
> > >>> 1909        sitn->fb_tunnel_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct ip_tunnel), "sit0",
> > >>> 1910                           NET_NAME_UNKNOWN,
> > >>> 1911                           ipip6_tunnel_setup);
> > >>> 1912        if (!sitn->fb_tunnel_dev) {
> > >>> 1913            err = -ENOMEM;
> > >>> 1914            goto err_alloc_dev;
> > >>> 1915        }
> > >>> 1916        dev_net_set(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev, net);
> > >>> 1917        sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->rtnl_link_ops = &sit_link_ops;
> > >>> 1918        /* FB netdevice is special: we have one, and only one per netns.
> > >>> 1919         * Allowing to move it to another netns is clearly unsafe.
> > >>> 1920         */
> > >>> 1921        sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->features |= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL;
> > >>> 1922
> > >>> 1923        err = register_netdev(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev);
> > >>> register_netdev on line 1923 will call if_nlmsg_size indirectly.
> > >>>
> > >>> On the other hand, the function that calls the paniced strlen is if_nlmsg_size:
> > >>> (gdb) disassemble if_nlmsg_size
> > >>> Dump of assembler code for function if_nlmsg_size:
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dc20 <+0>:    nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dc25 <+5>:    push   %rbp
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dc26 <+6>:    push   %r15
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dd04 <+228>:    je     0xffffffff81a0de20 <if_nlmsg_size+512>
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dd0a <+234>:    mov    0x10(%rbp),%rdi
> > >>>      ...
> > >>>    => 0xffffffff81a0dd0e <+238>:    callq  0xffffffff817532d0 <strlen>
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dd13 <+243>:    add    $0x10,%eax
> > >>>      0xffffffff81a0dd16 <+246>:    movslq %eax,%r12
> > >>
> > >> Excuse my ignorance, would that look the same for ppc64le?
> > >> Unfortunately, I didn’t save the problematic `vmlinuz` file, but on a
> > >> current build (without rcutorture) I have the line below, where strlen
> > >> shows up.
> > >>
> > >>       (gdb) disassemble if_nlmsg_size
> > >>       […]
> > >>       0xc000000000f7f82c <+332>: bl      0xc000000000a10e30 <strlen>
> > >>       […]
> > >>
> > >>> and the C code for 0xffffffff81a0dd0e is following (line 524):
> > >>> 515    static size_t rtnl_link_get_size(const struct net_device *dev)
> > >>> 516    {
> > >>> 517        const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops = dev->rtnl_link_ops;
> > >>> 518        size_t size;
> > >>> 519
> > >>> 520        if (!ops)
> > >>> 521            return 0;
> > >>> 522
> > >>> 523        size = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) + /* IFLA_LINKINFO */
> > >>> 524               nla_total_size(strlen(ops->kind) + 1);  /* IFLA_INFO_KIND */
> > >>
> > >> How do I connect the disassemby output with the corresponding line?
> > > I use "make  ARCH=powerpc CC=powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc-9
> > > CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- -j 16" to cross compile kernel
> > > for powerpc64le in my Ubuntu 20.04 x86_64.
> > >
> > > gdb-multiarch ./vmlinux
> > > (gdb)disassemble if_nlmsg_size
> > > [...]
> > > 0xc00000000191bf40 <+112>:    bl      0xc000000001c28ad0 <strlen>
> > > [...]
> > > (gdb) break *0xc00000000191bf40
> > > Breakpoint 1 at 0xc00000000191bf40: file ./include/net/netlink.h, line 1112.
> > >
> > > But in include/net/netlink.h:1112, I can't find the call to strlen
> > > 1110static inline int nla_total_size(int payload)
> > > 1111{
> > > 1112        return NLA_ALIGN(nla_attr_size(payload));
> > > 1113}
> > > This may be due to the compiler wrongly encode the debug information, I guess.
> >
> > `rtnl_link_get_size()` contains:
> >
> >              size = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) + /*
> > IFLA_LINKINFO */
> >                     nla_total_size(strlen(ops->kind) + 1);  /*
> > IFLA_INFO_KIND */
> >
> > Is that inlined(?) and the code at fault?
> Yes, that is inlined! because
> (gdb) disassemble if_nlmsg_size
> Dump of assembler code for function if_nlmsg_size:
> [...]
> 0xc00000000191bf38 <+104>:    beq     0xc00000000191c1f0 <if_nlmsg_size+800>
> 0xc00000000191bf3c <+108>:    ld      r3,16(r31)
> 0xc00000000191bf40 <+112>:    bl      0xc000000001c28ad0 <strlen>
> [...]
> (gdb)
> (gdb) break *0xc00000000191bf40
> Breakpoint 1 at 0xc00000000191bf40: file ./include/net/netlink.h, line 1112.
> (gdb) break *0xc00000000191bf38
> Breakpoint 2 at 0xc00000000191bf38: file net/core/rtnetlink.c, line 520.

I suggest building your kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y if you are not
already doing so.  That gives gdb a lot more information about things
like inlining.

							Thanx, Paul

> > >>> But ops is assigned the value of sit_link_ops in function sit_init_net
> > >>> line 1917, so I guess something must happened between the calls.
> > >>>
> > >>> Do we have KASAN in IBM machine? would KASAN help us find out what
> > >>> happened in between?
> > >>
> > >> Unfortunately, KASAN is not support on Power, I have, as far as I can
> > >> see. From `arch/powerpc/Kconfig`:
> > >>
> > >>           select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN                  if PPC32 && PPC_PAGE_SHIFT <= 14
> > >>           select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC          if PPC32 && PPC_PAGE_SHIFT <= 14
> > >>
> > > en, agree, I invoke "make  menuconfig  ARCH=powerpc
> > > CC=powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc-9 CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- -j
> > > 16", I can't find KASAN under Memory Debugging, I guess we should find
> > > the bug by bisecting instead.
> >
> > I do not know, if it is a regression, as it was the first time I tried
> > to run a Linux kernel built with rcutorture on real hardware.
> I tried to add some debug statements to the kernel to locate the bug
> more accurately,  you can try it when you're not busy in the future,
> or just ignore it if the following patch looks not very effective ;-)
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 1baab07820f6..969ac7c540cc 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -9707,6 +9707,9 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
>       *    Prevent userspace races by waiting until the network
>       *    device is fully setup before sending notifications.
>       */
> +    if (dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> +        printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND %s %s\n", dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +               dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      if (!dev->rtnl_link_ops ||
>          dev->rtnl_link_state == RTNL_LINK_INITIALIZED)
>          rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, dev, ~0U, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -9788,6 +9791,9 @@ int register_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
> 
>      if (rtnl_lock_killable())
>          return -EINTR;
> +    if (dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> +        printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND %s %s\n", dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +               dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      err = register_netdevice(dev);
>      rtnl_unlock();
>      return err;
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index e476403231f0..e08986ae6238 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -520,6 +520,8 @@ static size_t rtnl_link_get_size(const struct
> net_device *dev)
>      if (!ops)
>          return 0;
> 
> +    printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND %s %s\n", ops,
> +           ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      size = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) + /* IFLA_LINKINFO */
>             nla_total_size(strlen(ops->kind) + 1);  /* IFLA_INFO_KIND */
> 
> @@ -1006,6 +1008,9 @@ static size_t rtnl_proto_down_size(const struct
> net_device *dev)
>  static noinline size_t if_nlmsg_size(const struct net_device *dev,
>                       u32 ext_filter_mask)
>  {
> +    if (dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> +        printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND  %s %s\n", dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +               dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ifinfomsg))
>             + nla_total_size(IFNAMSIZ) /* IFLA_IFNAME */
>             + nla_total_size(IFALIASZ) /* IFLA_IFALIAS */
> @@ -3825,7 +3830,9 @@ struct sk_buff *rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb(int type,
> struct net_device *dev,
>      struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
>      struct sk_buff *skb;
>      int err = -ENOBUFS;
> -
> +    if (dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> +        printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND %s %s\n", dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +               dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      skb = nlmsg_new(if_nlmsg_size(dev, 0), flags);
>      if (skb == NULL)
>          goto errout;
> @@ -3861,7 +3868,9 @@ static void rtmsg_ifinfo_event(int type, struct
> net_device *dev,
> 
>      if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
>          return;
> -
> +    if (dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> +        printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND  %s %s\n", dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +               dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      skb = rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb(type, dev, change, event, flags, new_nsid,
>                       new_ifindex);
>      if (skb)
> @@ -3871,6 +3880,9 @@ static void rtmsg_ifinfo_event(int type, struct
> net_device *dev,
>  void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
>            gfp_t flags)
>  {
> +    if (dev->rtnl_link_ops)
> +        printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND  %s %s\n", dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +               dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      rtmsg_ifinfo_event(type, dev, change, rtnl_get_event(0), flags,
>                 NULL, 0);
>  }
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/sit.c b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> index c0b138c20992..fa5b2725811c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> @@ -1919,6 +1919,8 @@ static int __net_init sit_init_net(struct net *net)
>       * Allowing to move it to another netns is clearly unsafe.
>       */
>      sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->features |= NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL;
> -
> +    printk(KERN_INFO "%lx IFLA_INFO_KIND %s %s\n",
> +           sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->rtnl_link_ops,
> +           sitn->fb_tunnel_dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, __FUNCTION__);
>      err = register_netdev(sitn->fb_tunnel_dev);
>      if (err)
>          goto err_reg_dev;
> >
> > >>> Hope I can be of more helpful.
> > >>
> > >> Some distributions support multi-arch, so they easily allow
> > >> crosscompiling for different architectures.
> > > I use "make  ARCH=powerpc CC=powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc-9
> > > CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- -j 16" to cross compile kernel
> > > for powerpc64le in my Ubuntu 20.04 x86_64. But I can't boot the
> > > compiled kernel using "qemu-system-ppc64le -M pseries -nographic -smp
> > > 4 -net none -m 4G -kernel arch/powerpc/boot/zImage". I will continue
> > > to explore it.
> >
> > Oh, that does not sound good. But I have not tried that in a long time
> > either. It’s a separate issue, but maybe some of the PPC
> > maintainers/folks could help.
> I will do further research on this later.
> 
> Thanks for your time
> Kind regards
> Zhouyi
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ