lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 30 Jan 2022 10:43:35 +0800
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     justinkb@...il.com
Cc:     frank-w@...lic-files.de, broonie@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: BUG: [PATCH v2] isoc: mediatek: Check for error clk pointer

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:26:51PM +0800, Paul Mulders wrote:
> I guess this breaks all MT7622 SoCs since it'll prematurely exit
> init_clks (and subsequently init_scp) completely once devm_clk_get
> fails to get a reference to the mm clock producer (which happens to be
> the first one tried). This is because MT7623 has a GPU (so no mm
> clock) and MT7622 doesn't, and as a result the other clock producer
> pointers never get initialized (and other stuff in init_scp after
> returning from the error never happens).
>
> The patch seems fundamentally flawed, I guess it was either not tested
> at all, or only tested on a MT7623. The initialization functions seem
> designed with the idea that it's ok if some clocks aren't present, so
> stopping the initialization when one of them isn't present seems
> wrong. (For example, there is also a MT7622B variant of the MT7622
> which probably also lacks some clocks MT7622(A) does have).

I don't think the patch for init_clks() is flawed.
At most it is incompleted.
What it did is like fixing a potential error in the tool platform
providing service for the upper application, like what you said,
MT7623 and MT7622.
We should not keep the error in the platform because of the upper
application.
And it seems like it is MT7622 that is flawed.
The better way is to fix both the bug in init_clks() and its caller,
MT7622.

Sincerely thanks,
Jiang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ