linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] dt-bindings: i2c: add bindings for microchip mpfs i2c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:55:32 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
        <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>, <bin.meng@...driver.com>,
        <heiko@...ech.de>, <Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com>,
        <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>, <Ivan.Griffin@...rochip.com>,
        <atishp@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] dt-bindings: i2c: add bindings for microchip
 mpfs i2c

On 31/01/2022 15:39, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 5:45 AM <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Add device tree bindings for the i2c controller on
>> the Microchip PolarFire SoC.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>
> 
> There should not be a blank line here.
> 
> Also, tags should be in chronological order typically. If Daire sent
> this patch out with my tag, then the order is correct. If I gave it on
> a version you sent, then it goes between Daire's and your S-o-b which
> is the case here.
Oh, thanks. Probably been messing this up right/left/centre.

On another note, I know I'm still missing a RB still on some of the 
bindings, but what is the acceptance path for this series?
Any left over bindings not taken by subsystems via yourself and the dts 
changes via Palmer's tree?
> 
> 
> Rob
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>