[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6dfdfd02-bfc3-1626-f819-7ddcc8bf9c1c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 19:08:29 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@...dia.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 2/4] dmaengine: tegra: Add tegra gpcdma driver
31.01.2022 18:38, Akhil R пишет:
> Does the below method look good? bytes_xfer is updated on every ISR and in
> tx_status(), the wcount is read to calculate the intermittent value. If the transfer
> get complete in between, use wcount as 0 to add sg_req.len to bytes_xfer
>
> static int tegra_dma_get_residual(struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc)
> {
> unsigned long wcount = 0, status;
> unsigned int bytes_xfer, residual;
> struct tegra_dma_desc *dma_desc = tdc->dma_desc;
> struct tegra_dma_sg_req *sg_req = dma_desc->sg_req;
>
> /*
> * Do not read from CHAN_XFER_COUNT if EOC bit is set
> * as the transfer would have already completed and
> * the register could have updated for next transfer
> * in case of cyclic transfers.
> */
> status = tdc_read(tdc, TEGRA_GPCDMA_CHAN_STATUS);
> if (!(status & TEGRA_GPCDMA_STATUS_ISE_EOC))
> wcount = tdc_read(tdc, TEGRA_GPCDMA_CHAN_XFER_COUNT);
You can't read WCOUNT after the STATUS without racing with the STATUS
updates made by h/w. You should read the WCOUNT first and only then
check the STATUS.
You should also check whether T20 tegra_dma_sg_bytes_xferred()
workarounds apply to newer h/w. I see that the h/w base hasn't changed
much since T20.
Otherwise looks okay.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists