linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <69d0ac2f-f953-0890-b2d7-1c43c61be43f@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:18:28 -0800
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: cleanup double word in comment


On 1/31/22 10:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>
>> Remove the second 'know'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> This is ACPICA material, so it needs to be submitted to the upstream
> project via https://github.com/acpica/acpica/
>
> Also, it would be good to combine all of the analogous changes in one patch.

I am not sure if this is the last one for acpica, the finder script is 
very slow.

I will wait a bit and combine these in a day or two.

And take care of the other repo.

Tom

>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
>> index bdc7a30d1217c..b92605df3872c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exfldio.c
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ acpi_ex_setup_region(union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc,
>>   #ifdef ACPI_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT
>>          /*
>>           * If the Field access is any_acc, we can now compute the optimal
>> -        * access (because we know know the length of the parent region)
>> +        * access (because we know the length of the parent region)
>>           */
>>          if (!(obj_desc->common.flags & AOPOBJ_DATA_VALID)) {
>>                  if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> --
>> 2.26.3
>>