[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yfe25rpSY8OFPxzr@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:16:06 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Handle dra7 timer
wrap errata i940
Hi,
* Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com> [220129 21:05]:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 09:43:26AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > There is a timer wrap issue on dra7 for the ARM architected timer.
> > In a typical clock configuration the timer fails to wrap after 388 days.
> >
> > To work around the issue, we need to use timer-ti-dm percpu timers instead.
> >
> > Let's configure dmtimer3 and 4 as percpu timers by default, and warn about
> > the issue if the dtb is not configured properly.
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> This causes a conflict for IPU2 which is using timer 3 and 4.
>
> From arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-ipu-dsp-common.dtsi:
>
> &ipu2 {
> mboxes = <&mailbox6 &mbox_ipu2_ipc3x>;
> ti,timers = <&timer3>;
> ti,watchdog-timers = <&timer4>, <&timer9>;
> };
OK, sorry I missed that part.
> I noticed an error ("could not get timer platform device") when booting
> mainline on a BeagleBoard X15 (AM578):
>
> omap-rproc 55020000.ipu: assigned reserved memory node ipu2-memory@...00000
> remoteproc remoteproc1: 55020000.ipu is available
> remoteproc remoteproc1: powering up 55020000.ipu
> remoteproc remoteproc1: Booting fw image dra7-ipu2-fw.xem4, size 3747220
> omap-rproc 55020000.ipu: could not get timer platform device
> omap-rproc 55020000.ipu: omap_rproc_enable_timers failed: -19
> remoteproc remoteproc1: can't start rproc 55020000.ipu: -19
>
> I switched this errata fix to use timer 15 and 16 instead which resolves
> the error. Do you think that is an acceptable solution?
I think the only difference is that timers 15 and 16 are in l4_per3 instead
of l4_per1. I doubt that matters as they are pretty much always clocked in
this case. If you want to check you can run cyclictest :)
> If so, I will post the patch to the list.
OK thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists