linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/16] tools/include: Add io.h stub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51a1719144b57f3c17252832d0cd97ca8ff17293.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:54:21 +0100
From:   Karolina Drobnik <karolinadrobnik@...il.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mike.rapoport@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] tools/include: Add io.h stub

Hi Mike,

On Sun, 2022-01-30 at 18:10 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:21:59PM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 14:09 +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 02:21:25PM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote:
> > > > Add a dummy io.h header.
> > > 
> > > Rather begs the question of what memblock.c needs from
> > > linux/io.h.
> > > 
> > > Wouldn't it be better to:
> > > 
> > > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > > @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> > >  #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > > 
> > >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> > > -#include <linux/io.h>
> > > 
> > >  #include "internal.h"
> > > 
> > 
> > That was something I considered in the very beginning, but didn't
> > have
> > a chance to verify it works for all architectures. I can take a
> > look
> > after I'm finished with other v2 changes.
> > 
> > > (allmodconfig on x86-64 builds fine with this; I have not done an
> > > extended sweep of other arches / build options).
> 
> I did a sweep for defconfigs for all arches and all were fine.

Thanks for doing the sweep, it's very helpful.

> Karolina, please send the formal patch. Let's see how kbuild bot
> reacts.

OK, will send something later today.


All the best,
Karolina