[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220131105215.860810413@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:55:51 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 06/64] PM: wakeup: simplify the output logic of pm_show_wakelocks()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
commit c9d967b2ce40d71e968eb839f36c936b8a9cf1ea upstream.
The buffer handling in pm_show_wakelocks() is tricky, and hopefully
correct. Ensure it really is correct by using sysfs_emit_at() which
handles all of the tricky string handling logic in a PAGE_SIZE buffer
for us automatically as this is a sysfs file being read from.
Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/power/wakelock.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/power/wakelock.c
+++ b/kernel/power/wakelock.c
@@ -39,23 +39,20 @@ ssize_t pm_show_wakelocks(char *buf, boo
{
struct rb_node *node;
struct wakelock *wl;
- char *str = buf;
- char *end = buf + PAGE_SIZE;
+ int len = 0;
mutex_lock(&wakelocks_lock);
for (node = rb_first(&wakelocks_tree); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
wl = rb_entry(node, struct wakelock, node);
if (wl->ws->active == show_active)
- str += scnprintf(str, end - str, "%s ", wl->name);
+ len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "%s ", wl->name);
}
- if (str > buf)
- str--;
- str += scnprintf(str, end - str, "\n");
+ len += sysfs_emit_at(buf, len, "\n");
mutex_unlock(&wakelocks_lock);
- return (str - buf);
+ return len;
}
#if CONFIG_PM_WAKELOCKS_LIMIT > 0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists