lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:56:21 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 5.4 36/64] hwmon: (lm90) Mark alert as broken for MAX6680 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> commit 94746b0ba479743355e0d3cc1cb9cfe3011fb8be upstream. Experiments with MAX6680 and MAX6681 show that the alert function of those chips is broken, similar to other chips supported by the lm90 driver. Mark it accordingly. Fixes: 4667bcb8d8fc ("hwmon: (lm90) Introduce chip parameter structure") Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static const struct lm90_params lm90_par }, [max6680] = { .flags = LM90_HAVE_OFFSET | LM90_HAVE_CRIT - | LM90_HAVE_CRIT_ALRM_SWP, + | LM90_HAVE_CRIT_ALRM_SWP | LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT, .alert_alarms = 0x7c, .max_convrate = 7, },
Powered by blists - more mailing lists