[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220131105222.291685883@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:56:16 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 055/100] hwmon: (lm90) Mark alert as broken for MAX6680
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
commit 94746b0ba479743355e0d3cc1cb9cfe3011fb8be upstream.
Experiments with MAX6680 and MAX6681 show that the alert function of those
chips is broken, similar to other chips supported by the lm90 driver.
Mark it accordingly.
Fixes: 4667bcb8d8fc ("hwmon: (lm90) Introduce chip parameter structure")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static const struct lm90_params lm90_par
},
[max6680] = {
.flags = LM90_HAVE_OFFSET | LM90_HAVE_CRIT
- | LM90_HAVE_CRIT_ALRM_SWP,
+ | LM90_HAVE_CRIT_ALRM_SWP | LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT,
.alert_alarms = 0x7c,
.max_convrate = 7,
},
Powered by blists - more mailing lists