[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220131105222.254828909@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:56:15 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 054/100] hwmon: (lm90) Mark alert as broken for MAX6646/6647/6649
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
commit f614629f9c1080dcc844a8430e3fb4c37ebbf05d upstream.
Experiments with MAX6646 and MAX6648 show that the alert function of those
chips is broken, similar to other chips supported by the lm90 driver.
Mark it accordingly.
Fixes: 4667bcb8d8fc ("hwmon: (lm90) Introduce chip parameter structure")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static const struct lm90_params lm90_par
.max_convrate = 9,
},
[max6646] = {
- .flags = LM90_HAVE_CRIT,
+ .flags = LM90_HAVE_CRIT | LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT,
.alert_alarms = 0x7c,
.max_convrate = 6,
.reg_local_ext = MAX6657_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists