lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220131105221.758203839@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:56:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 039/100] powerpc/32s: Allocate one 256k IBAT instead of two consecutives 128k IBATs

From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>

commit 37eb7ca91b692e8e49e7dd50158349a6c8fb5b09 upstream.

Today we have the following IBATs allocated:

	---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]---
	0: 0xc0000000-0xc03fffff 0x00000000         4M Kernel   x     m
	1: 0xc0400000-0xc05fffff 0x00400000         2M Kernel   x     m
	2: 0xc0600000-0xc06fffff 0x00600000         1M Kernel   x     m
	3: 0xc0700000-0xc077ffff 0x00700000       512K Kernel   x     m
	4: 0xc0780000-0xc079ffff 0x00780000       128K Kernel   x     m
	5: 0xc07a0000-0xc07bffff 0x007a0000       128K Kernel   x     m
	6:         -
	7:         -

The two 128K should be a single 256K instead.

When _etext is not aligned to 128Kbytes, the system will allocate
all necessary BATs to the lower 128Kbytes boundary, then allocate
an additional 128Kbytes BAT for the remaining block.

Instead, align the top to 128Kbytes so that the function directly
allocates a 256Kbytes last block:

	---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]---
	0: 0xc0000000-0xc03fffff 0x00000000         4M Kernel   x     m
	1: 0xc0400000-0xc05fffff 0x00400000         2M Kernel   x     m
	2: 0xc0600000-0xc06fffff 0x00600000         1M Kernel   x     m
	3: 0xc0700000-0xc077ffff 0x00700000       512K Kernel   x     m
	4: 0xc0780000-0xc07bffff 0x00780000       256K Kernel   x     m
	5:         -
	6:         -
	7:         -

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ab58b296832b0ec650e2203200e060adbcb2677d.1637930421.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c
@@ -201,18 +201,17 @@ void mmu_mark_initmem_nx(void)
 	int nb = mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_USE_HIGH_BATS) ? 8 : 4;
 	int i;
 	unsigned long base = (unsigned long)_stext - PAGE_OFFSET;
-	unsigned long top = (unsigned long)_etext - PAGE_OFFSET;
+	unsigned long top = ALIGN((unsigned long)_etext - PAGE_OFFSET, SZ_128K);
 	unsigned long border = (unsigned long)__init_begin - PAGE_OFFSET;
 	unsigned long size;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nb - 1 && base < top && top - base > (128 << 10);) {
+	for (i = 0; i < nb - 1 && base < top;) {
 		size = block_size(base, top);
 		setibat(i++, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT);
 		base += size;
 	}
 	if (base < top) {
 		size = block_size(base, top);
-		size = max(size, 128UL << 10);
 		if ((top - base) > size) {
 			size <<= 1;
 			if (strict_kernel_rwx_enabled() && base + size > border)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ