[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <164360127045.4233.2606812444285122570.stgit@noble.brown>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:03:53 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] remove dependence of inode_congested()
Miklos pointed out that the filesystems which set the bdi congestion
flags do gain some value from that, and simply removing the code is not
appropriate.
Specifically, readahead and/or writeback are skipped when the congestion
flags are set.
We can mostly move this skipping into the filesystem.
->readahead can do nothing if reads are congested.
->writepage and ->wrtepages can do nothing for WB_SYNC_NONE if writes
are congested.
Currently only *some* WB_SYNC_NONE writes are skipped due to congestion.
Those from sync_file_range() and those used for page migration are not.
Also, shrink_page_list() will now cause PageActive to be set if
->writepage skips due to congestion.
I don't expect these changes to be a problem, but I have no experience
to base that on.
Review/comments most welcome,
Thanks,
NeilBrown
---
NeilBrown (3):
fuse: remove reliance on bdi congestion
nfs: remove reliance on bdi congestion
ceph: remove reliance on bdi congestion
fs/ceph/addr.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
fs/ceph/super.c | 1 +
fs/ceph/super.h | 1 +
fs/nfs/write.c | 12 ++++++++++--
include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
Signature
Powered by blists - more mailing lists