linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 023/200] powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:54:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 023/200] powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass

From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit f9320c49993ca3c0ec0f9a7026b313735306bb8b upstream.

These instructions are updated after the initial JIT, so redo codegen
during the extra pass. Rename bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls() to clarify
that this is more than just subprog calls.

Fixes: 69c087ba6225b5 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.15
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7cc162af77ba918eb3ecd26ec9e7824bc44b1fae.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c   |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c |    6 ++++++
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c |    7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -23,15 +23,15 @@ static void bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns(void
 	memset32(area, BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION, size / 4);
 }
 
-/* Fix the branch target addresses for subprog calls */
-static int bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
-				       struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs)
+/* Fix updated addresses (for subprog calls, ldimm64, et al) during extra pass */
+static int bpf_jit_fixup_addresses(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
+				   struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs)
 {
 	const struct bpf_insn *insn = fp->insnsi;
 	bool func_addr_fixed;
 	u64 func_addr;
 	u32 tmp_idx;
-	int i, ret;
+	int i, j, ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < fp->len; i++) {
 		/*
@@ -66,6 +66,23 @@ static int bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls(s
 			 * of the JITed sequence remains unchanged.
 			 */
 			ctx->idx = tmp_idx;
+		} else if (insn[i].code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW)) {
+			tmp_idx = ctx->idx;
+			ctx->idx = addrs[i] / 4;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
+			PPC_LI32(ctx->b2p[insn[i].dst_reg] - 1, (u32)insn[i + 1].imm);
+			PPC_LI32(ctx->b2p[insn[i].dst_reg], (u32)insn[i].imm);
+			for (j = ctx->idx - addrs[i] / 4; j < 4; j++)
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+#else
+			func_addr = ((u64)(u32)insn[i].imm) | (((u64)(u32)insn[i + 1].imm) << 32);
+			PPC_LI64(b2p[insn[i].dst_reg], func_addr);
+			/* overwrite rest with nops */
+			for (j = ctx->idx - addrs[i] / 4; j < 5; j++)
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+#endif
+			ctx->idx = tmp_idx;
+			i++;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -193,13 +210,13 @@ skip_init_ctx:
 		/*
 		 * Do not touch the prologue and epilogue as they will remain
 		 * unchanged. Only fix the branch target address for subprog
-		 * calls in the body.
+		 * calls in the body, and ldimm64 instructions.
 		 *
 		 * This does not change the offsets and lengths of the subprog
 		 * call instruction sequences and hence, the size of the JITed
 		 * image as well.
 		 */
-		bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs);
+		bpf_jit_fixup_addresses(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs);
 
 		/* There is no need to perform the usual passes. */
 		goto skip_codegen_passes;
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *
 		bool func_addr_fixed;
 		u64 func_addr;
 		u32 true_cond;
+		u32 tmp_idx;
+		int j;
 
 		/*
 		 * addrs[] maps a BPF bytecode address into a real offset from
@@ -839,8 +841,12 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *
 		 * 16 byte instruction that uses two 'struct bpf_insn'
 		 */
 		case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW: /* dst = (u64) imm */
+			tmp_idx = ctx->idx;
 			PPC_LI32(dst_reg_h, (u32)insn[i + 1].imm);
 			PPC_LI32(dst_reg, (u32)insn[i].imm);
+			/* padding to allow full 4 instructions for later patching */
+			for (j = ctx->idx - tmp_idx; j < 4; j++)
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
 			/* Adjust for two bpf instructions */
 			addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
 			break;
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *
 		u64 imm64;
 		u32 true_cond;
 		u32 tmp_idx;
+		int j;
 
 		/*
 		 * addrs[] maps a BPF bytecode address into a real offset from
@@ -806,9 +807,13 @@ emit_clear:
 		case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW: /* dst = (u64) imm */
 			imm64 = ((u64)(u32) insn[i].imm) |
 				    (((u64)(u32) insn[i+1].imm) << 32);
+			tmp_idx = ctx->idx;
+			PPC_LI64(dst_reg, imm64);
+			/* padding to allow full 5 instructions for later patching */
+			for (j = ctx->idx - tmp_idx; j < 5; j++)
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
 			/* Adjust for two bpf instructions */
 			addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
-			PPC_LI64(dst_reg, imm64);
 			break;
 
 		/*