linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 128/200] powerpc/64s: Mask SRR0 before checking against the masked NIP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220131105237.865731453@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:56:31 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 128/200] powerpc/64s: Mask SRR0 before checking against the masked NIP

From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit aee101d7b95a03078945681dd7f7ea5e4a1e7686 ]

Commit 314f6c23dd8d ("powerpc/64s: Mask NIP before checking against
SRR0") masked off the low 2 bits of the NIP value in the interrupt
stack frame in case they are non-zero and mis-compare against a SRR0
register value of a CPU which always reads back 0 from the 2 low bits
which are reserved.

This now causes the opposite problem that an implementation which does
implement those bits in SRR0 will mis-compare against the masked NIP
value in which they have been cleared. QEMU is one such implementation,
and this is allowed by the architecture.

This can be triggered by sigfuz by setting low bits of PT_NIP in the
signal context.

Fix this for now by masking the SRR0 bits as well. Cleaner is probably
to sanitise these values before putting them in registers or stack, but
this is the quick and backportable fix.

Fixes: 314f6c23dd8d ("powerpc/64s: Mask NIP before checking against SRR0")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117134403.2995059-1-npiggin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt_64.S | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt_64.S
index 4b1ff94e67eb4..4c6d1a8dcefed 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt_64.S
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ COMPAT_SYS_CALL_TABLE:
 	.ifc \srr,srr
 	mfspr	r11,SPRN_SRR0
 	ld	r12,_NIP(r1)
+	clrrdi  r11,r11,2
 	clrrdi  r12,r12,2
 100:	tdne	r11,r12
 	EMIT_WARN_ENTRY 100b,__FILE__,__LINE__,(BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ONCE)
@@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ COMPAT_SYS_CALL_TABLE:
 	.else
 	mfspr	r11,SPRN_HSRR0
 	ld	r12,_NIP(r1)
+	clrrdi  r11,r11,2
 	clrrdi  r12,r12,2
 100:	tdne	r11,r12
 	EMIT_WARN_ENTRY 100b,__FILE__,__LINE__,(BUGFLAG_WARNING | BUGFLAG_ONCE)
-- 
2.34.1