[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YffUqErSVDgbGLTu@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:23:04 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: guoren@...nel.org
Cc: palmer@...belt.com, arnd@...db.de, anup@...infault.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, liush@...winnertech.com,
wefu@...hat.com, drew@...gleboard.org, wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/17] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 08:17:16PM +0800, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Let's follow the origin patch's spirit:
>
> The only difference between rv32_defconfig and defconfig is that
> rv32_defconfig has CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y.
>
> This is helpful to compare rv64-compat-rv32 v.s. rv32-linux.
>
> Fixes: 1b937e8faa87ccfb ("RISC-V: Add separate defconfig for 32bit systems")
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Wouldn't a common.config that generats both the 32-bit and 64-bit
configs a better idea?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists