[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YffWtTq2y6K8+gHF@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:31:49 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa
<smita.koralahallichannabasappa@....com>,
Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] PPIN (Protected Processor Inventory Number)
updates
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:47:37AM -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> ...
They look good so far on my PPIN-enabled AMD box.
> 5) Add "ppin" to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/ppin
>
> The big question for this part is whether there is a better
> place to expose this value. I'm open to other suggestions.
Yeah, I'm not sure about that either. I have
$ grep -r . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/ppin | cut -d: -f 2 | uniq -c
32 0xxxxx
32 times the same number.
Wouldn't
/sys/devices/system/node/
be a better place?
Even if those were logical nodes, it would still be less needless
replication and that would be one more way for root to figure out which
logical nodes belong to the same physical package... :-)
Hmm.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists