lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2hcjLomPg3HmXAEacdzYtgCFvBQoE5AUBgsH+ETTu-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:51:39 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Sami Kyostila <skyostil@...omium.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>, evanbenn@...omium.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/misc: add transfer ioctl for HPS

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 9:23 AM Sami Kyostila <skyostil@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> I guess we could add an LSM hook for I2C transfers, but that would
> require baking device addresses into the SELinux policy which seems a
> little unfortunate.
>
> I think that leaves the options suggested by Arnd (thanks!):
>
> a) Add a generic way to expose device nodes for individual I2C devices
> (something like /dev/i2c/by-id/NN?).
>
> b) Make the ioctl interface more fully featured instead of just exposing I2C.
>
> I think I'm leaning toward (a) since it's not yet totally clear what
> the right high level abstraction for this type of device is (e.g.,
> should it be HID, in which case the protocol should probably become
> HID-I2C).

(adding i2c list to cc)

I think the implementation of the character device should be really
straightforward, it can probably just use the exact same ioctls
as the normal device, or a subset of them, and filter out any access
that has the wrong address with ioctl(fd, I2C_SLAVE, ...) or other
commands.

The tricky part is coming up with a sensible way of creating those
character device nodes, as there generic method of knowing what
is attached to the bus. I suppose this could be done either
automatically based on the nodes in DT, or it could be done
with user interaction like a new ioctl command on the normal
device node or some sysfs interface to create the chardev for
a particular slave device.

           Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ