[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRXDotO1L1FMojQs6msrqvCzA782Pux8rg3AfZgA=y0ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:50:58 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, Wei Fu <wefu@...hat.com>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
Wang Junqiang <wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 16/17] riscv: compat: Add COMPAT Kbuild skeletal support
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:26 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Given that most rv64 implementations can't run in rv32 mode, what is the
> failure mode if someone tries it with the compat mode enabled?
A static linked simple hello_world could still run on a non-compat
support hardware. But most rv32 apps would meet different userspace
segment faults.
Current code would let the machine try the rv32 apps without detecting
whether hw support or not.
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists