[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ed6d576-63cb-fdd5-eaee-cc4154d25e0d@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:42:08 -0600
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Adrien Thierry <athierry@...hat.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_bcm2835aux: Add ACPI support
Hi,
On 2/1/22 13:24, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 2/1/2022 10:50 AM, Adrien Thierry wrote:
>> Add ACPI support to 8250_bcm2835aux driver. This makes it possible to
>> use the miniuart on the Raspberry Pi with the tianocore/edk2 UEFI
>> firmware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrien Thierry <athierry@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>> b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>> index fd95860cd..b904b321e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> * simultaneously to rs485.
>> */
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> @@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ struct bcm2835aux_data {
>> u32 cntl;
>> };
>> +struct bcm2835_aux_serial_acpi_driver_data {
>> + resource_size_t offset;
>> +};
>> +
>> static void bcm2835aux_rs485_start_tx(struct uart_8250_port *up)
>> {
>> if (!(up->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) {
>> @@ -82,8 +87,12 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct uart_8250_port up = { };
>> struct bcm2835aux_data *data;
>> + struct bcm2835_aux_serial_acpi_driver_data *acpi_data;
>> struct resource *res;
>> int ret;
>> + resource_size_t mapbase;
>> + resource_size_t mapsize;
>> + unsigned int uartclk;
>> /* allocate the custom structure */
>> data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -108,10 +117,12 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>> - /* get the clock - this also enables the HW */
>> - data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> - if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
>> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk), "could
>> not get clk\n");
>> + if (dev_of_node(&pdev->dev)) {
>> + /* get the clock - this also enables the HW */
>> + data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
>> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk),
>> "could not get clk\n");
>> + }
>
> This does not seem necessary, if the clk is NULL when probed via ACPI,
> all of the clk_* APIs will deal with that gracefully. If you need not to
> treat -ENOENT as a hard error here, consider switching to
> devm_clk_get_optional(). Given that you look at the 'clock-frequency'
> property, you can still have some generic code, something like:
>
> if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
> ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "clock-frequency",
> &uartclk);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "could not get clk\n");
> }
>
>> /* get the interrupt */
>> ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> @@ -125,20 +136,59 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "memory resource not found");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> - up.port.mapbase = res->start;
>> - up.port.mapsize = resource_size(res);
>> -
>> - /* Check for a fixed line number */
>> - ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial");
>> - if (ret >= 0)
>> - up.port.line = ret;
>> -
>> - /* enable the clock as a last step */
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->clk);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to enable uart clock - %d\n",
>> - ret);
>> - return ret;
>
> All of that path can be common, and you can just define an offset to
> apply to the resource at the top after you fetched the memory resource.
> The offset will be non-0 for ACPI and 0 for non-ACPI. That is, no need
> for the intermediate variables and conditional paths whether this is
> ACPI apply this offset, or not.
>
>> +
>> + mapbase = res->start;
>> + mapsize = resource_size(res);
>> +
>> + if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) {
>> + const struct acpi_device_id *match;
>> +
>> + match = acpi_match_device(pdev->dev.driver->acpi_match_table,
>> &pdev->dev);
>> + if (!match)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + acpi_data = (struct bcm2835_aux_serial_acpi_driver_data
>> *)match->driver_data;
>> +
>> + /* Some UEFI implementations (e.g. tianocore/edk2 for the
>> Raspberry Pi)
>> + * describe the miniuart with a base address that encompasses
>> the auxiliary
>> + * registers shared between the miniuart and spi.
>> + *
>> + * This is due to historical reasons, see discussion here :
>> + * https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/87501357#84349
>> + *
>> + * We need to add the offset between the miniuart and auxiliary
>> + * registers to get the real miniuart base address.
>
> And ACPI on the Pi4 is so widely deployed that fixing the miniuart
> resources is not an option at all? This really really continues to
> contribute to my impression that ACPI on the Pi4 is a fad more than a
> real thing, sorry.
The problem again, is that this resource is legacy and used by
windows/vmware/etc on both the rpi3 and rpi4. So, unfortunately it
cannot really be changed without breaking existing OSs.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists