linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: aggregator: Fix calling into sleeping GPIO controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:58:10 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Mikko Salomäki <ms@...arespons.se>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: aggregator: Fix calling into sleeping GPIO controllers

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 9:35 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:09 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:

...

> > > +       return chip->can_sleep ? gpiod_get_value_cansleep(fwd->descs[offset])
> > > +                              : gpiod_get_value(fwd->descs[offset]);
> >
> > This indentation kills the perfectionist in me :-)
>
> Why? The above is aligned perfectly ("?" just above ":")?
>
> > What about:
> >
> >        return chip->can_sleep ?
> >                gpiod_get_value_cansleep(fwd->descs[offset]) :
> > gpiod_get_value(fwd->descs[offset]);
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Or as variant
> >
> >        struct gpio_desc *desc = fwd->descs[offset];
> >
> >        return chip->can_sleep ? gpiod_get_value_cansleep(desc) :
> > gpiod_get_value(desc);
> >
> > ?
>
> IMHO, those are ugly as hell ;-)

I have the same opinion about your initial variant. :-)

So, up to the maintainer(s) what to do.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko