linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/25] 4.4.302-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220201212423.GA1830865@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:24:23 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/25] 4.4.302-rc1 review

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 07:16:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> NOTE!  This is the proposed LAST 4.4.y kernel release to happen under
> the rules of the normal stable kernel releases.  After this one, it will
> be marked End-Of-Life as it has been 6 years and you really should know
> better by now and have moved to a newer kernel tree.  After this one, no
> more security fixes will be backported and you will end up with an
> insecure system over time.
> 
> --------------------------
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.302 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 03 Feb 2022 18:08:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 160 pass: 160 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 342 pass: 342 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

Guenter