linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 05/43] x86/compressed/64: Detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier in boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfmmBykN2s0HsiAJ@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 22:28:39 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        brijesh.ksingh@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/43] x86/compressed/64: Detect/setup SEV/SME
 features earlier in boot

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:35:07PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> Unfortunately rdmsr()/wrmsr()/__rdmsr()/__wrmsr() etc. definitions are all
> already getting pulled in via:
> 
>   misc.h:
>     #include linux/elf.h
>       #include linux/thread_info.h
>         #include linux/cpufeature.h
>           #include linux/processor.h
>             #include linux/msr.h
> 
> Those definitions aren't usable in boot/compressed because of __ex_table
> and possibly some other dependency hellishness.

And they should not be. Mixing kernel proper and decompressor code needs
to stop and untangling that is a multi-year effort, unfortunately. ;-\

> Would read_msr()/write_msr() be reasonable alternative names for these new
> helpers, or something else that better distinguishes them from the
> kernel proper definitions?

Nah, just call them rdmsr/wrmsr(). There is already {read,write}_msr()
tracepoint symbols in kernel proper and there's no point in keeping them
apart using different names - that ship has long sailed.

> It doesn't look like anything in boot/ pulls in boot/compressed/
> headers. It seems to be the other way around, with boot/compressed
> pulling in headers and whole C files from boot/.
> 
> So perhaps these new definitions should be added to a small boot/msr.h
> header and pulled in from there?

That sounds good too.

> Should we introduce something like this as well for cpucheck.c? Or
> re-write cpucheck.c to make use of the u64 versions? Or just set the
> cpucheck.c rework aside for now? (but still introduce the above helpers
> as boot/msr.h in preparation)?

How about you model it after

static int msr_read(u32 msr, struct msr *m)

from arch/x86/lib/msr.c which takes struct msr from which you can return
either u32s or a u64?

The stuff you share between the decompressor and kernel proper you put
in a arch/x86/include/asm/shared/ folder, for an example, see what we do
there in the TDX patchset:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124150215.36893-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com

I.e., you move struct msr in such a shared header and then you include
it everywhere needed.

The arch/x86/boot/ msr helpers are then plain and simple, without
tracepoints and exception fixups and you define them in ...boot/msr.c or
so.

If the patch gets too big, make sure to split it in a couple so that it
is clear what happens at each step.

How does that sound?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette