linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] uapi: remove the unused HAVE_ARCH_STRUCT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 08:42:54 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] uapi: remove the unused HAVE_ARCH_STRUCT_FLOCK64
 define

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:16:27AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> Right?
> 
> Seems you've based on an old tree, right?

This was a fairly recent Linus tree.  I don't have the tree at hand
right now due to travel, but what changed there recently?