linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of secondary CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yfkt4sX094so/Kub@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 13:56:02 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rcu@...r.kernel.org" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mimoja@...oja.de" <mimoja@...oja.de>,
        "hewenliang4@...wei.com" <hewenliang4@...wei.com>,
        "hushiyuan@...wei.com" <hushiyuan@...wei.com>,
        "luolongjun@...wei.com" <luolongjun@...wei.com>,
        "hejingxian@...wei.com" <hejingxian@...wei.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of
 secondary CPUs

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:39:17PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> In the top of my git tree, you can see a half-baked 'parallel part 2'
> commit which introduces a new x86/cpu:wait-init cpuhp state that would
> invoke do_wait_cpu_initialized() for each CPU in turn, which *would*
> release them all into load_ucode_bsp() at the same time and have
> precisely the problem you're describing.

The load_ucode_bsp() is the variant that runs on the boot CPU but
yeah...

> I'll commit a FIXME comment now so that it doesn't slip my mind.

Yap, thank Cooper for pointing out that whole thing about how microcode
loading is special and can't always handle parallelism. :)

> Hm, not sure I see how that's protecting itself from someone
> simultaneously echoing 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${SIBLING}/online

So

echo 1 > ../online

means onlining the sibling.

But reload_store() grabs the CPU hotplug lock *first* and *then* runs
check_online_cpus() to see if all CPUs are online. It doesn't do the
update if even one CPU is missing. You can't offline any CPU for the
duration of the update...

So I guess you'd need to explain in more detail what protection hole
you're seeing because I might be missing something here.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette