[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51f54519-bb8b-f108-1c1e-4fed101ca5ef@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:09:12 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] drm/tiny: Add driver for Solomon SSD1307 OLED
displays
Hello Geert,
On 2/1/22 12:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Since the current binding has a compatible "ssd1305fb-i2c", we could make the
>> new one "ssd1305drm-i2c" or better, just "ssd1305-i2c".
>
> DT describes hardware, not software policy.
> If the hardware is the same, the DT bindings should stay the same.
>
Yes I know that but the thing is that the current binding don't describe
the hardware correctly. For instance, don't use a backlight DT node as a
property of the panel and have this "fb" suffix in the compatible strings.
Having said that, my opinion is that we should just keep with the existing
bindings and make compatible to that even if isn't completely correct.
Since that will ease adoption of the new DRM driver and allow users to use
it without the need to update their DTBs.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists