[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YflNNRCibwcy7F3Q@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:09:41 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/const.h: Explain how __is_constexpr() works
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:05:53PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> I don't think adding slightly inaccurate comments would help a future
> reader at all. Then it's better to just stick to Linus' "it's art, and
> art should not be explained".
/* You are not expected to understand this */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists