linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280-idp: No need for "input-enable" on sw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 10:27:43 -0800
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>,
        swboyd@...omium.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280-idp: No need for
 "input-enable" on sw_ctrl

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 04:10:42PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Specifying "input-enable" on a MSM GPIO is a no-op for the most
> part. The only thing it really does is to explicitly force the output
> of a GPIO to be disabled right at the point of a pinctrl
> transition. We don't need to do this and we don't typically specify
> "input-enable" unless there's a good reason to. Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>