[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yfl/Sneg9/HPOjBe@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:43:22 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ACPI: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 07:00:42PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with
> acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().
>
> No intentional functional impact.
...
> + if (!adev || i2c_acpi_get_info(adev, &info, adapter, NULL))
AFAICS the !adev check is redundant since acpi_device_enumerated() does it.
> return AE_OK;
...
> + struct acpi_device *adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle);
>
> - if (i2c_acpi_do_lookup(adev, lookup))
> + if (!adev || i2c_acpi_do_lookup(adev, lookup))
> return AE_OK;
Here we need it indeed.
Dunno, if acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() can gain the check itself.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists