lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Feb 2022 20:43:22 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ACPI: Replace acpi_bus_get_device()

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 07:00:42PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Replace acpi_bus_get_device() that is going to be dropped with
> acpi_fetch_acpi_dev().
> 
> No intentional functional impact.

...

> +	if (!adev || i2c_acpi_get_info(adev, &info, adapter, NULL))

AFAICS the !adev check is redundant since acpi_device_enumerated() does it.

>  		return AE_OK;

...

> +	struct acpi_device *adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle);
>  
> -	if (i2c_acpi_do_lookup(adev, lookup))
> +	if (!adev || i2c_acpi_do_lookup(adev, lookup))
>  		return AE_OK;

Here we need it indeed.
Dunno, if acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() can gain the check itself.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ