lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:49:40 -0600
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        wsa@...nel.org, rrangel@...omium.org, mw@...ihalf.com,
        jaz@...ihalf.com, upstream@...ihalf.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        alexander.deucher@....com, Nimesh.Easow@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: designware: Add AMD PSP I2C bus support

On 2/2/2022 08:43, Jan Dabros wrote:
> Implement an I2C controller sharing mechanism between the host (kernel)
> and PSP co-processor on some platforms equipped with AMD Cezanne SoC.
> 
> On these platforms we need to implement "software" i2c arbitration.
> Default arbitration owner is PSP and kernel asks for acquire as well
> as inform about release of the i2c bus via mailbox mechanism.
> 
>              +---------+
>   <- ACQUIRE |         |
>    +---------|   CPU   |\
>    |         |         | \      +----------+  SDA
>    |         +---------+  \     |          |-------
> MAILBOX                   +--> |  I2C-DW  |  SCL
>    |         +---------+        |          |-------
>    |         |         |        +----------+
>    +---------|   PSP   |
>     <- ACK   |         |
>              +---------+
> 
>              +---------+
>   <- RELEASE |         |
>    +---------|   CPU   |
>    |         |         |        +----------+  SDA
>    |         +---------+        |          |-------
> MAILBOX                   +--> |  I2C-DW  |  SCL
>    |         +---------+  /     |          |-------
>    |         |         | /      +----------+
>    +---------|   PSP   |/
>     <- ACK   |         |
>              +---------+
> 
> The solution is similar to i2c-designware-baytrail.c implementation, where
> we are using a generic i2c-designware-* driver with a small "wrapper".
> 
> In contrary to baytrail semaphore implementation, beside internal
> acquire_lock() and release_lock() methods we are also applying quirks to
> lock_bus() and unlock_bus() global adapter methods. With this in place
> all i2c clients drivers may lock i2c bus for a desired number of i2c
> transactions (e.g. write-wait-read) without being aware of that such bus
> is shared with another entity.
> 
> Modify i2c_dw_probe_lock_support() to select correct semaphore
> implementation at runtime, since now we have more than one available.
> 
> Configure new matching ACPI ID "AMDI0019" and register
> ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE flag in order to distinguish setup with PSP
> arbitration.
> 
> Add myself as a reviewer for I2C DesignWare in order to help with reviewing
> and testing possible changes touching new i2c-designware-amdpsp.c module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS                                  |   1 +
>   drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c                      |   7 +-
>   drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig                   |  11 +
>   drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile                  |   1 +
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c   | 389 +++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c |  12 +-
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h     |  18 +-
>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c  |  60 +++
>   8 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index f41088418aae..e0a7e05c5a41 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -18666,6 +18666,7 @@ SYNOPSYS DESIGNWARE I2C DRIVER
>   M:	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
>   R:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>   R:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> +R:	Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
>   L:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
>   S:	Maintained
>   F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-*
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> index e7934ba79b02..ad245bbd965e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
> @@ -232,12 +232,13 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_apd_device_ids[] = {
>   	/* Generic apd devices */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE
>   	{ "AMD0010", APD_ADDR(cz_i2c_desc) },
> -	{ "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(wt_i2c_desc) },
>   	{ "AMD0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
> -	{ "AMDI0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
> -	{ "AMDI0022", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
>   	{ "AMD0030", },
>   	{ "AMD0040", APD_ADDR(fch_misc_desc)},
> +	{ "AMDI0010", APD_ADDR(wt_i2c_desc) },
> +	{ "AMDI0019", APD_ADDR(wt_i2c_desc) },

Did you already check with anyone in AMD about reserving this ID?

Considering this design is specific to arbitration used for Chromebooks 
I wonder if it is better to be GOOG ID?

I can see it both ways, but if you didn't already talk to anyone and the 
consensus is for it to be AMDI****, I will ask around internally about 
reserving it / making sure there are no future or existing conflicts.

> +	{ "AMDI0020", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
> +	{ "AMDI0022", APD_ADDR(cz_uart_desc) },
>   	{ "HYGO0010", APD_ADDR(wt_i2c_desc) },
>   #endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index 42da31c1ab70..5ea26a7aa1d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -553,6 +553,17 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>   	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
>   	  will be called i2c-designware-platform.
>   
> +config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
> +	bool "AMD PSP I2C semaphore support"
> +	depends on X86_MSR
> +	depends on ACPI
> +	depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> +	help
> +	  This driver enables managed host access to the selected I2C bus shared
> +	  between AMD CPU and AMD PSP.
> +
> +	  You should say Y if running on an AMD system equipped with the PSP.
> +
>   config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
>   	bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support"
>   	depends on ACPI
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> index 1d00dce77098..752f47be3fc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ i2c-designware-core-y					+= i2c-designware-master.o
>   i2c-designware-core-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_SLAVE) 	+= i2c-designware-slave.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM)			+= i2c-designware-platform.o
>   i2c-designware-platform-y 				:= i2c-designware-platdrv.o
> +i2c-designware-platform-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP)	+= i2c-designware-amdpsp.o
>   i2c-designware-platform-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL) += i2c-designware-baytrail.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI)			+= i2c-designware-pci.o
>   i2c-designware-pci-y					:= i2c-designware-pcidrv.o
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a45e4faeb2c1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,389 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> +#include <linux/psp-sev.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/msr.h>
> +
> +#include "i2c-designware-core.h"
> +
> +#define MSR_AMD_PSP_ADDR	0xc00110a2
> +#define PSP_MBOX_OFFSET		0x10570
> +#define PSP_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS	500
> +
> +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_BUS_CMD		0x64
> +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_CNT		10
> +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_DELAY_USEC	(50 * 1000)
> +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_OK		0x0
> +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_BUS_BUSY	0x1
> +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_INV_PARAM	0x3
> +
> +#define PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_STS		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_CMD		GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_RESERVED	GENMASK(29, 24)
> +#define PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_RECOVERY	BIT(30)
> +#define PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_READY		BIT(31)
> +
> +struct psp_req_buffer_hdr {
> +	u32 total_size;
> +	u32 status;
> +};
> +
> +enum psp_i2c_req_type {
> +	PSP_I2C_REQ_ACQUIRE,
> +	PSP_I2C_REQ_RELEASE,
> +	PSP_I2C_REQ_MAX
> +};
> +
> +struct psp_i2c_req {
> +	struct psp_req_buffer_hdr hdr;
> +	enum psp_i2c_req_type type;
> +} __aligned(32);
> +
> +struct psp_mbox {
> +	u32 cmd_fields;
> +	u64 i2c_req_addr;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(psp_i2c_access_mutex);
> +static unsigned long psp_i2c_sem_acquired;
> +static void __iomem *mbox_iomem;
> +static u32 psp_i2c_access_count;
> +static bool psp_i2c_mbox_fail;
> +static struct device *psp_i2c_dev;
> +
> +/*
> + * Implementation of PSP-x86 i2c-arbitration mailbox introduced for AMD Cezanne
> + * family of SoCs.
> + */
> +
> +static int psp_get_mbox_addr(unsigned long *mbox_addr)
> +{
> +	unsigned long long psp_mmio;
> +
> +	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_AMD_PSP_ADDR, &psp_mmio))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	*mbox_addr = (unsigned long)(psp_mmio + PSP_MBOX_OFFSET);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int psp_mbox_probe(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long mbox_addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = psp_get_mbox_addr(&mbox_addr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mbox_iomem = ioremap(mbox_addr, sizeof(struct psp_mbox));
> +	if (!mbox_iomem)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +/* Recovery field should be equal 0 to start sending commands */
> +static int psp_check_mbox_recovery(struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox)
> +{
> +	u32 tmp;
> +
> +	tmp = readl(&mbox->cmd_fields);
> +
> +	return FIELD_GET(PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_RECOVERY, tmp);
> +}
> +
> +static int psp_wait_cmd(struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox)
> +{
> +	u32 tmp, expected;
> +
> +	/* Expect mbox_cmd to be cleared and ready bit to be set by PSP */
> +	expected = FIELD_PREP(PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_READY, 1);
> +
> +	return readl_poll_timeout(&mbox->cmd_fields, tmp, (tmp == expected),
> +				  0, 1000 * PSP_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +}
> +
> +/* Status equal to 0 means that PSP succeed processing command */
> +static int psp_check_mbox_sts(struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox)
> +{
> +	u32 cmd_reg;
> +
> +	cmd_reg = readl(&mbox->cmd_fields);
> +
> +	return FIELD_GET(PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_STS, cmd_reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int psp_send_cmd(struct psp_i2c_req *req)
> +{
> +	struct psp_mbox __iomem *mbox = mbox_iomem;
> +	phys_addr_t req_addr;
> +	u32 cmd_reg;
> +
> +	if (psp_check_mbox_recovery(mbox))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	if (psp_wait_cmd(mbox))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Fill mailbox with address of command-response buffer, which will be
> +	 * used for sending i2c requests as well as reading status returned by
> +	 * PSP. Use physical address of buffer, since PSP will map this region.
> +	 */
> +	req_addr = __psp_pa((void *)req);
> +	writeq(req_addr, &mbox->i2c_req_addr);
> +
> +	/* Write command register to trigger processing */
> +	cmd_reg = FIELD_PREP(PSP_MBOX_FIELDS_CMD, PSP_I2C_REQ_BUS_CMD);
> +	writel(cmd_reg, &mbox->cmd_fields);
> +
> +	if (psp_wait_cmd(mbox))
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> +	if (psp_check_mbox_sts(mbox))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Helper to verify status returned by PSP */
> +static int check_i2c_req_sts(struct psp_i2c_req *req)
> +{
> +	int status;
> +
> +	status = readl(&req->hdr.status);
> +
> +	switch (status) {
> +	case PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_OK:
> +		return 0;
> +	case PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_BUS_BUSY:
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	case PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_INV_PARAM:
> +	default:
> +		return -EIO;
> +	};
> +}
> +
> +static int psp_send_check_i2c_req(struct psp_i2c_req *req)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Errors in x86-PSP i2c-arbitration protocol may occur at two levels:
> +	 * 1. mailbox communication - PSP is not operational or some IO errors
> +	 * with basic communication had happened;
> +	 * 2. i2c-requests - PSP refuses to grant i2c arbitration to x86 for too
> +	 * long.
> +	 * In order to distinguish between these two in error handling code, all
> +	 * errors on the first level (returned by psp_send_cmd) are shadowed by
> +	 * -EIO.
> +	 */
> +	if (psp_send_cmd(req))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	return check_i2c_req_sts(req);
> +}
> +
> +static int psp_send_i2c_req(enum psp_i2c_req_type i2c_req_type)
> +{
> +	struct psp_i2c_req *req;
> +	unsigned long start;
> +	int status, ret;
> +
> +	/* Allocate command-response buffer */
> +	req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!req)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	req->hdr.total_size = sizeof(*req);
> +	req->type = i2c_req_type;
> +
> +	start = jiffies;
> +	ret = read_poll_timeout(psp_send_check_i2c_req, status,
> +				(status != -EBUSY),
> +				PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_DELAY_USEC,
> +				PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_CNT * PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_DELAY_USEC,
> +				0, req);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	if (status) {
> +		ret = status;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(psp_i2c_dev, "Request accepted by PSP after %ums\n",
> +		jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	kfree(req);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int psp_acquire_i2c_bus(void)
> +{
> +	int status;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&psp_i2c_access_mutex);
> +
> +	/* Return early if mailbox malfunctioned */
> +	if (psp_i2c_mbox_fail)
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Simply increment usage counter and return if PSP semaphore was
> +	 * already taken by kernel.
> +	 */
> +	if (psp_i2c_access_count > 0) {
> +		psp_i2c_access_count++;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	};
> +
> +	status = psp_send_i2c_req(PSP_I2C_REQ_ACQUIRE);
> +	if (status) {
> +		if (status == -ETIMEDOUT)
> +			dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Timed out waiting for PSP to release I2C bus\n");
> +		else
> +			dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "PSP communication error\n");
> +
> +		dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Assume i2c bus is for exclusive host usage\n");
> +		psp_i2c_mbox_fail = true;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +
> +	psp_i2c_sem_acquired = jiffies;
> +	psp_i2c_access_count++;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In case of errors with PSP arbitrator psp_i2c_mbox_fail variable is
> +	 * set above. As a consequence consecutive calls to acquire will bypass
> +	 * communication with PSP. At any case i2c bus is granted to the caller,
> +	 * thus always return success.
> +	 */
> +cleanup:
> +	mutex_unlock(&psp_i2c_access_mutex);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void psp_release_i2c_bus(void)
> +{
> +	int status;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&psp_i2c_access_mutex);
> +
> +	/* Return early if mailbox was malfunctional */
> +	if (psp_i2c_mbox_fail)
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we are last owner of PSP semaphore, need to release aribtration
> +	 * via mailbox.
> +	 */
> +	psp_i2c_access_count--;
> +	if (psp_i2c_access_count > 0)
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Send a release command to PSP */
> +	status = psp_send_i2c_req(PSP_I2C_REQ_RELEASE);
> +	if (status) {
> +		if (status == -ETIMEDOUT)
> +			dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Timed out waiting for PSP to acquire I2C bus\n");
> +		else
> +			dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "PSP communication error\n");
> +
> +		dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Assume i2c bus is for exclusive host usage\n");
> +		psp_i2c_mbox_fail = true;
> +		goto cleanup;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_dbg(psp_i2c_dev, "PSP semaphore held for %ums\n",
> +		jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - psp_i2c_sem_acquired));
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	mutex_unlock(&psp_i2c_access_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Locking methods are based on the default implementation from
> + * drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c, but with psp acquire and release operations
> + * added. With this in place we can ensure that i2c clients on the bus shared
> + * with psp are able to lock HW access to the bus for arbitrary number of
> + * operations - that is e.g. write-wait-read.
> + */
> +static void i2c_adapter_dw_psp_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> +					unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	psp_acquire_i2c_bus();
> +	rt_mutex_lock_nested(&adapter->bus_lock, i2c_adapter_depth(adapter));
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_adapter_dw_psp_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> +					  unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adapter->bus_lock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	psp_acquire_i2c_bus();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void i2c_adapter_dw_psp_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> +					  unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	psp_release_i2c_bus();
> +	rt_mutex_unlock(&adapter->bus_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_lock_operations i2c_dw_psp_lock_ops = {
> +	.lock_bus = i2c_adapter_dw_psp_lock_bus,
> +	.trylock_bus = i2c_adapter_dw_psp_trylock_bus,
> +	.unlock_bus = i2c_adapter_dw_psp_unlock_bus,
> +};
> +
> +int i2c_dw_amdpsp_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!(dev->flags & ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	/* Allow to bind only one instance of a driver */
> +	if (psp_i2c_dev)
> +		return -EEXIST;
> +
> +	psp_i2c_dev = dev->dev;
> +
> +	ret = psp_mbox_probe();
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	dev_info(psp_i2c_dev, "I2C bus managed by AMD PSP\n");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Install global locking callbacks for adapter as well as internal i2c
> +	 * controller locks.
> +	 */
> +	dev->adapter.lock_ops = &i2c_dw_psp_lock_ops;
> +	dev->acquire_lock = psp_acquire_i2c_bus;
> +	dev->release_lock = psp_release_i2c_bus;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Unmap area used as a mailbox with PSP */
> +void i2c_dw_amdpsp_remove_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	iounmap(mbox_iomem);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> index c6a7a00e1d52..45774aa47c28 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> @@ -12,25 +12,25 @@
>   
>   #include "i2c-designware-core.h"
>   
> -int i2c_dw_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> +int i2c_dw_baytrail_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   {
>   	acpi_status status;
>   	unsigned long long shared_host = 0;
>   	acpi_handle handle;
>   
> -	if (!dev || !dev->dev)
> -		return 0;
> +	if (!dev)
> +		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev->dev);
>   	if (!handle)
> -		return 0;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_SEM", NULL, &shared_host);
>   	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> -		return 0;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	if (!shared_host)
> -		return 0;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	if (!iosf_mbi_available())
>   		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> index 4b26cba40139..1d65212fddbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
> @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ struct reset_control;
>    * @hs_lcnt: high speed LCNT value
>    * @acquire_lock: function to acquire a hardware lock on the bus
>    * @release_lock: function to release a hardware lock on the bus
> + * @semaphore_idx: Index of table with semaphore type attached to the bus. It's
> + *	-1 if there is no semaphore.
>    * @shared_with_punit: true if this bus is shared with the SoCs PUNIT
>    * @disable: function to disable the controller
>    * @disable_int: function to disable all interrupts
> @@ -285,6 +287,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
>   	u16			hs_lcnt;
>   	int			(*acquire_lock)(void);
>   	void			(*release_lock)(void);
> +	int			semaphore_idx;
>   	bool			shared_with_punit;
>   	void			(*disable)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
>   	void			(*disable_int)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> @@ -297,6 +300,7 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
>   
>   #define ACCESS_INTR_MASK	BIT(0)
>   #define ACCESS_NO_IRQ_SUSPEND	BIT(1)
> +#define ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE	BIT(2)
>   
>   #define MODEL_MSCC_OCELOT	BIT(8)
>   #define MODEL_BAIKAL_BT1	BIT(9)
> @@ -310,6 +314,11 @@ struct dw_i2c_dev {
>   #define AMD_UCSI_INTR_REG	0x474
>   #define AMD_UCSI_INTR_EN	0xd
>   
> +struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks {
> +	int	(*probe)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> +	void	(*remove)(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> +};
> +
>   int i2c_dw_init_regmap(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
>   u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset);
>   u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset);
> @@ -370,9 +379,12 @@ static inline void i2c_dw_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>   }
>   
>   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL)
> -extern int i2c_dw_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> -#else
> -static inline int i2c_dw_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) { return 0; }
> +int i2c_dw_baytrail_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> +#endif
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP)
> +int i2c_dw_amdpsp_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> +void i2c_dw_amdpsp_remove_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
>   #endif
>   
>   int i2c_dw_validate_speed(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 2bd81abc86f6..9973ac894a51 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
>   	{ "808622C1", ACCESS_NO_IRQ_SUSPEND },
>   	{ "AMD0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
>   	{ "AMDI0010", ACCESS_INTR_MASK },
> +	{ "AMDI0019", ACCESS_INTR_MASK | ARBITRATION_SEMAPHORE },
>   	{ "AMDI0510", 0 },
>   	{ "APMC0D0F", 0 },
>   	{ "HISI02A1", 0 },
> @@ -204,6 +205,63 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id dw_i2c_hwmon_class_dmi[] = {
>   	{ } /* terminate list */
>   };
>   
> +static const struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
> +	{
> +		.probe = i2c_dw_baytrail_probe_lock_support,
> +	},
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP
> +	{
> +		.probe = i2c_dw_amdpsp_probe_lock_support,
> +		.remove = i2c_dw_amdpsp_remove_lock_support,
> +	},
> +#endif
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static int i2c_dw_probe_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks *ptr;
> +	int i = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ptr = i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table;
> +
> +	dev->semaphore_idx = -1;
> +
> +	while (ptr->probe) {
> +		ret = ptr->probe(dev);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If there is no semaphore device attached to this
> +			 * controller, we shouldn't abort general i2c_controller
> +			 * probe.
> +			 */
> +			if (ret != -ENODEV)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			i++;
> +			ptr++;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev->semaphore_idx = i;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void i2c_dw_remove_lock_support(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	if (dev->semaphore_idx < 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table[dev->semaphore_idx].remove)
> +		i2c_dw_semaphore_cb_table[dev->semaphore_idx].remove(dev);
> +}
> +
>   static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	struct i2c_adapter *adap;
> @@ -334,6 +392,8 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>   	dw_i2c_plat_pm_cleanup(dev);
>   
> +	i2c_dw_remove_lock_support(dev);
> +
>   	reset_control_assert(dev->rst);
>   
>   	return 0;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ