[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:22:03 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@...hat.com>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jim Cadden <jcadden@....com>,
Daniele Buono <dbuono@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, dougmill@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com, gjoyce@....com,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Allow guest access to EFI confidential computing
secret area
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 08:10, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 08:05:23AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > I see different platform patches trying to stick these blobs in
> > different locations and ways to access (securityfs, sysfs, char device
> > node), which seems crazy to me. Why can't we at least pick one way to
> > access these to start with, and then have the filesystem layout be
> > platform-specific as needed, which will give the correct hints to
> > userspace as to what it needs to do here?
>
> Which other examples are you thinking of? I think this conversation may
> have accidentally become conflated with a different prior one and now
> we're talking at cross purposes.
This came up a while ago during review of one of the earlier revisions
of this patch set.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/YRZuIIVIzMfgjtEl@google.com/
which describes another two variations on the theme, for pKVM guests
as well as Android bare metal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists