[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 01:11:56 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...el.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 19/29] x86/topology: Disable CPU online/offline
control for TDX guests
On Wed, Feb 02 2022 at 01:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24 2022 at 18:02, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> static bool intel_cc_platform_has(enum cc_attr attr)
>> {
>> - if (attr == CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO)
>> + switch (attr) {
>> + case CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO:
>> + case CC_ATTR_HOTPLUG_DISABLED:
Not that I care much, but I faintly remember that I suggested that in
one of the gazillion of threads.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists