[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 20:52:01 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-imx@....com,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
Wyon Bi <bivvy.bi@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] phy: dphy: Correct clk_pre parameter
On 24-01-22, 10:40, Liu Ying wrote:
> The D-PHY specification (v1.2) explicitly mentions that the T-CLK-PRE
> parameter's unit is Unit Interval(UI) and the minimum value is 8. Also,
> kernel doc of the 'clk_pre' member of struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy
> mentions that it should be in UI. However, the dphy core driver wrongly
> sets 'clk_pre' to 8000, which seems to hint that it's in picoseconds.
>
> So, let's fix the dphy core driver to correctly reflect the T-CLK-PRE
> parameter's minimum value according to the D-PHY specification.
>
> I'm assuming that all impacted custom drivers shall program values in
> TxByteClkHS cycles into hardware for the T-CLK-PRE parameter. The D-PHY
> specification mentions that the frequency of TxByteClkHS is exactly 1/8
> the High-Speed(HS) bit rate(each HS bit consumes one UI). So, relevant
> custom driver code is changed to program those values as
> DIV_ROUND_UP(cfg->clk_pre, BITS_PER_BYTE), then.
>
> Note that I've only tested the patch with RM67191 DSI panel on i.MX8mq EVK.
> Help is needed to test with other i.MX8mq, Meson and Rockchip platforms,
> as I don't have the hardwares.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists