lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n50+AzZv2Q7Uda0OpEKxkbSY_-S8_CZeScjicChm94Dtjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 21:28:01 +0000
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     pmaliset@...eaurora.org, mka@...omium.org,
        quic_rjendra@...cinc.com,
        Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>,
        kgodara@...eaurora.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
        sibis@...eaurora.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Clean up sdc1 / sdc2 pinctrl

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2022-02-02 13:23:38)
> This patch makes a few improvements to the way that sdc1 / sdc2
> pinctrl is specified on sc7280:
>
> 1. There's no reason to "group" the sdc pins into one overarching node
> and there's a downside: we have to replicate the hierarchy in the
> board device tree files. Let's clean this up.
>
> 2. There's really not a lot of reason not to list the "pinctrl" for
> sdc1 (eMMC) in the SoC dtsi file. These aren't GPIO pins and
> everyone's going to specify the same pins.
>
> 3. Even though it's likely that boards will need to override pinctrl
> for sdc2 (SD card) to add the card detect GPIO, we can be symmetric
> and add it to the SoC dsti file.
>
> 4. Let's get rid of the word "on" from the normal config and add a
> "sleep" suffix to the sleep config. This looks cleaner to me.
>
> This is intended to be a no-op change but it could plausibly change
> behavior depending on how the pinctrl code parses things. One thing to
> note is that "SD card detect" is explicitly listed now as keeping its
> pull enabled in sleep since we still want to detect card insertions
> even if the controller is suspended (because no card is inserted). The
> pinctrl framework likely did this anyway, but it's nice to see it
> explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ