[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n505w5HH0=cTTMvhso9YvqBahtYCdOr+t5_pbxsoZpsmFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 21:45:28 +0000
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: pmaliset@...eaurora.org, mka@...omium.org,
quic_rjendra@...cinc.com,
Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>,
kgodara@...eaurora.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
sibis@...eaurora.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Remove "qcom,sc7280"
from top-level of boards
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2022-02-02 13:23:48)
> There's a proposal to take the SoC name out of the top-level
> compatible and move it under the "soc@0" node. Building on the patch
> ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add the CPU compatible to the soc@0
> node"), which added this to the soc@0 node, this removes it from the
> top-level node.
>
> NOTE: while the previous patch could land at any time without any
> compatibility issues, this patch will cause problems without a code
> change to the cpufreq driver [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAE-0n50sX9-0MxcpF+3Rwqm75jSw5=aNwdsitLwE2sEA69jLJw@mail.gmail.com
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
It needs to wait though, as stated above.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists